ABSTRACT
Avaliar a influência da laparoscopia na rotina cirúrgica do Serviço de Urologia do HC-UFMG. Métodos: Foi feita uma análise retrospectiva de todas as cirurgias, para tratamento de cálculos, realizadas no HC-UFMG entre janeiro de 2004 e outubro de 2008. Resultados: No total foram realizados 613 procedimentos e 4.850 litotripsias extracorpóreas (LECOs). Ao estratificarmos o tipo de procedimento cirúrgico realizado em função do tempo, temos que: no período inicial do estudo (2004), houve apenas seis (4,7%) casos de litíase tratados pela via laparoscópica, já no ano de 2008, os procedimentos laparoscópicos corresponderam a 17 (15,2%) casos. Conclusões: As principais modalidades no tratamento de cálculos urinários são os procedimentos endoscópicos e a LECO. A laparoscopia, apesar de ter indicações limitadas, vem ganhando espaço frente à cirurgia aberta, principalmente nos casos refratários a tratamentos menos invasivos.
This paper aims to determine the influence of the laparoscopy in the treatment of urinary stones in a tertiary hospital (HC-UFMG). Methods: We reviewed our data from January 2004 to October 2008. All patients, who underwent surgery in our institution for the treatment of urinary calculi, were enrolled. Results: Six hundred and thirteen procedures and 4,850 shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) were performed. In the first year of the study (2004), only six (4.7%) cases were done by laparoscopic approach, whereas in the last year (2008) a total of 17 (15.2%) cases were performed using the laparoscopic technique. Conclusion: The SWL and the endoscopic surgery remained as the first line treatment of urinary stones, during the whole period studied. The laparoscopic technique, despite its limitations, is getting acceptance (over the traditional open procedure) and is indicated in those cases where minimally invasive techniques have failed.